Bradford Cohen on Representing Drake When He Was Accused of Paying to Kill XXXTentacion (Part 9)
Episode notes from djvlad
Become a VladStocks Member now: https://www.youtube.com/vladtv/join
Watch this Full Interview: https://youtu.be/aNjgGteVQXw
Part 10: https://youtu.be/HU0E0To_VPs
Part 8: https://youtu.be/8rLejxp4NvA
Part 1: https://youtu.be/K7__iCx2ghE
——–
Attorney Bradford Cohen joins Vlad to break down how he represented Drake during the XXXTentacion murder trial controversy, when a defense lawyer attempted to subpoena the Toronto rapper over an unsupported theory that Drake had paid for a hit. Cohen explains why the subpoena attempts failed, how the judge viewed the claims as irrelevant, and why Drake was never required to testify in the Florida case involving XXXTentacion’s killing.
Cohen also discusses another civil subpoena matter involving Drake, his brief work connected to Ice Spice after the viral McDonald’s altercation, and his philosophy on using lawsuits to deter future harassment or assaults. The conversation expands into celebrity legal strategy, civil litigation costs, Megan Thee Stallion’s defamation battle with a blogger, and why public figures often take aggressive legal action even when financial recovery is unlikely. A candid look at hip-hop, law, media narratives, and courtroom tactics.









Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.