Bradford Cohen: I Would Never Represent D4vd in His Murder Case (Part 12)
Episode notes from djvlad
Become a VladStocks Member now: https://www.youtube.com/vladtv/join
Watch this Full Interview: https://youtu.be/aNjgGteVQXw
Part 11: https://youtu.be/szq6njHw5QE
Part 1: https://youtu.be/K7__iCx2ghE
——–
Criminal defense attorney Bradford Cohen sits down with Vlad to break down the ethics and realities of representing clients in high-profile murder cases. Cohen discusses defending Nima Momeni in the Bob Lee case, the Cash App founder’s fatal stabbing in San Francisco, and explains why he believed the trial raised serious questions around self-defense, evidence, the missing “white car,” and potential appeal issues.
The conversation also turns to the D4vd case, where Cohen explains how he evaluates disturbing allegations, why every defendant deserves a defense, and why not every case deserves a “Brad Cohen defense.” Vlad and Cohen also analyze the Keefe D Las Vegas murder trial involving Tupac Shakur, Judge Mathis’ legal take, VladTV interview evidence, and why a 90-minute guilty verdict stood out. Cohen closes by discussing legal ethics, celebrity clients, fair representation, and what separates principled attorneys from lawyers who exploit clients.









Comments
No comments yet. Start the conversation.